Any reference to CASACIR or its directors, shareholders, owners or operators relates to pre-14 February 2024 when the company was sold. In no way can anything said relate to the company or its new owners, operators, directors, and shareholders after that sale.
What has happened to the legal system that allows someone the perceived right to make false claims about others? It’s very strange that the legal teams on the other side believed that they have the right to claim that I have been malicious in simply writing and revealing the truth.
Man X, man Y and CASACIR took action against me and, using Southall, Kaye and Smith, had inserted no less than 81 inaccurate claims to the Supreme Court and the same number of inaccurate denials, all in the knowledge that they were inaccurate, then presented them to the court as absolute truth and fact. After having succeeded in threatening, bullying, and intimidating me into removing my entire former website, they immediately withdrew 66 of the inaccurate claims and 66 of the inaccurate denials (they did not want them to go to trial and be exposed for the inaccurate claims and denials they were). However, they continued on with the remaining 15 inaccurate claims and 15 inaccurate denials (they claimed that I had defamed them) and they only did so because they knew that I had been barred from revealing the truth and using truth and justification as defences (barred from using truth and justification as defences because I had been left defenceless by the legal team I fired because, inter alia, they refused to follow instructions and had taken over $110,000 from me in fees – fees effectively paid to them for causing me severe trouble).
Without the truth in their claims, Smith, Kaye and Southall (along with their clients, man X, man Y and CASACIR) had falsely claimed that “In their natural and ordinary meaning, certain of the website publications were defamatory to [man X and man Y]”, “[Her] lack of good faith is demonstrated by the volume of [purportedly] defamatory material published by her on the quarry fight website, the frequent and continued publication if that material, and the general nature and tenor of her publication on that website”, “[Her] dominant motivation in making the website publications was in furtherance of her campaign to discredit and injure [man X, man Y and CASACIR]”, and “[I]n making and publishing [man X, man Y and CASACIR] Statements [she] was actuated by malice. Further, the making of the [man X, man Y and CASACIR] Statements was calculated to cause pecuniary damage to [man X, man Y and CASACIR”, and “Further, the making of the website publication has occurred in circumstances demonstrating: (a) lack of good faith (b) the existence of a collateral or anterior purpose; and (c) unjustified and unreasonable conduct”. All of this was rubbish and they didn’t want it tested.
After I had lost significantly because of the conduct of Smith, Schivo (a then employee of Smith), Southall, Kaye and then Spencer leading up to and in court, I commenced this website in 2017, showing the injustice system at work and the part that each played in the injustice. Barrister ABC (a short-term pseudonym required by court action) has admitted that he and many other of the legal fraternity listed in my website had all known since at least early 2018 that I had written about each of them and what I had written – yet chose to do nothing because they knew they would fail this time because I could and would prove the truth of what I had written. Additionally, I was also told in 2018 that my website (purportedly) “defames a whole bunch of people [but] nobody’s worried about your website. It’s wonderful entertainment” – clearly this notification was very accurate because, as I said, not one person took any actual action regarding it.
Earlier this year (2021), clearly in an effort to test the water to see what I would do this time when I was again bullied, intimidated and threatened, Barrister ABC hired a solicitor, Mark Schofield of Nicholas O’Donohue & Co, to represent him and pretend that he was going to take me to court because of what I wrote about him. In the documents they supplied me, they falsely claimed that what I had written about Barrister ABC was done “maliciously, knowing its contents were false or recklessly not caring whether they were false or not; and [with the intention] to cause loss and damage to [Barrister ABC] including in his professional capacity” – this was in spite of Barrister ABC having intimate knowledge of at least some of the inaccuracies of his claims against me, the others he treated with indifference to the truth.
Why is it that they all claimed that I had knowingly lied about what had happened when it was them lying, and having done so in the full knowledge that, if there was malice, it was from them having deliberately lied about me, not me having lied about them.
Malice, according to the internet, means [citations removed]: “A wicked intention to do an injury. It is not confined to the intention of doing an injury to any particular person, but extends to an evil design, a corrupt and wicked notion against some one at the time of committing the crime … In criminal law. In its legal sense, this word does not simply mean ill will against a person, but signifies a wrongful act done intentionally, without just cause or excuse. A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it) which operates to the prejudice of another person”[1], “[It is] a conscious, intentional wrongdoing either of a civil wrong like libel (false written statement about another) … This intention includes ill-will, hatred or total disregard for the other’s well-being… Proof of malice is absolutely necessary for a “public figure” to win a lawsuit for defamation”[2], “A desire to harm others or to see others suffer; extreme ill will or spite. The intent to commit an unlawful act without justification or excuse. An improper motive for an action, such as desire to cause injury to another … the desire to do harm or mischief, evil intent, the state of mind with which an act is committed and from which the intent to do wrong may be inferred, a desire to inflict harm or suffering on another, harmful intent on the part of a person who commits an unlawful act injurious to another”[3], “The desire to inflict injury, harm, or suffering on another, either because of a hostile impulse or out of deep-seated meanness, evil intent on the part of a person who commits a wrongful act injurious to others. … [To hold] a grudge, enmity, hostility, bitterness, resentment, ill will, animus, meanness, antipathy, animosity, rancor, hatred, mordacity, umbrage, spite, malevolence, venom, poison, maliciousness, acerbity [toward another person]”[4], “[The] desire to cause pain, injury, or distressto another [by] an attack motivated by pure malice. [The] intentto commit an unlawful act or cause harm without legal justification or excuse”[5], “In a general sense, the term denotes ill-will, a preconceived design of doing mischief or harm to another, bad faith, evil motive , wanton or reckless disregard of rights of others. Also, denotes the wrongful act done intentionally without just cause or excuse … In the law of defamation the claim of qualified privilege by a defendant will be defeated by showing malice on his part, and in this context, the term denotes a state of mind arising from hatred or ill-will evidencing a willingness to vex, annoy or injure and that the publication of the defamatory statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not”[6][7], “The term ‘malice’ has been used in two different senses. In a legal sense it means ‘intentional wrongdoing, without a just cause or excuse or a lack of a reasonable or probable cause ‘and it is known as ‘malice in law’ and in another sense, it means’ an improper or evil motive’ and it is known as ‘malice in fact’”[8], “Some common synonyms of malice are grudge, ill will, malevolence, malignity, spite, and spleen. While all these words mean “the desire to see another experience pain, injury, or distress,” malice implies a deep- seated often unexplainable desire to see another suffer”[9]. Other additional meanings for malice are: animosity, bitterness, enmity, evil, hatefulness, hatred, hostility, meanness, maliciousness, poison, rancor, resentment, umbrage, venom, viciousness, vindictiveness.[10]
All I have done is reveal the truth (and they hate and resent the fact that I have done so), yet it’s strange that they obviously feel very free to falsely accuse me of the very actions that they have exhibited, and to effectively accuse me (and in one case actually accuse me) of the above attitudes and conduct when it is my honest opinion that they had the shoe on the wrong foot and actually had it back-to-front.
[1] Thelaw.Com Law Dictionary & Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
[2] Legal Dictionary l Law.com
[3] The Free Dictionary
[4] Dictionary.com
[5] Miriam Webster
[6] Free Online Dictionary of Law Terms and Legal Definitions
[7] Particularly note that these words were knowingly and fraudulently deliberately used against me by Barrister ABC and Schofield
[8] www.blackgown.in
[9] Miriam Webster
[10] Dictionary.com